Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kerry Sakolsky who wrote (5699)	6/13/1999 8:57:00 PM
From: chris431	Respond to of 18366

No, I haven't seen the letter and said so in my post to which you were replying: "as a side note, he would also not privately send it to me and in fact did not respond. As such, I'm in no way trying to bolster his claims)." Chris

To: Kerry Sakolsky who wrote (5699)	6/13/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: chris431	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18366

Since we're so demanding of Walter (the letter from Ness), why aren't we all asking where Ness got his info. He says an article and he will look for it. Give me a break. Where is it? Aren't we all curious of peoples sources and honesty? Doesn't dodging the issue (both Walter & Ness) seem a little bit suspicious? Let's be fair, at this point both of them are equally as likely to be lying (although a better argument could be made Ness has better reasons to lie over a Sony/EDIG rumor than does Walter in correcting such a rumor). People have spent numerous posts bashing Walter for not releasing an email, yet very few (from me and Walter) concerning Ness's inability to produce his source. I wonder why we haven't seen the source of Ness's info yet? Hmmmm....because it doesn't exist. Chris