Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: art slott who wrote (11862)	6/13/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos	Respond to of 17770

> Imagine how many more would be dead if the world wasn't watching. Hundreds of thousands, millions? Billions actually. The majority of the killings were done by Jim....you can reach him at webmaster@ethnicleansing.com

To: art slott who wrote (11862)	6/13/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: the gator	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Art did you get a load of the moron who said Slobo only wanted to "RELOCATE" the Albanians? Where to graveyards and of course the raping of children, and looting and pillaging were just coincidental. Guess when you are the descendants of slavers anything goes.

To: art slott who wrote (11862)	6/14/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: Andy Thomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Art, The argument that we're there to stop genocide simply doesn't ring true, for if it did, we'd be bombing places in Africa, and probably bombing Moscow and Beijing as well. It seems we practice selective indignation where genocide is concerned. Your side might get more respect if they were honest and said something instead like, "we're involved in Yugoslavia not because of the genocide, but for the sake of security, as stability in that region is much more important to us than it is in Chechnya, Mongolia, Rwanda, or Cambodia, etc." The genocide argument simply rings hollow. Now, once your side comes to admit that this is a matter of security and not morals, would you also be willing to admit that perhaps the methods used thus far in attaining security might have produced - in the words of an engineer - "sub-optimal results?" FWIW Andy