Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (12112)	6/14/1999 5:38:00 PM
From: MHS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Wee Willie Wexler, Put up or shut up. Since you offer absolutely no proof, nothing you say can be taken seriously. mhs BTW, I have taken FMK to task.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (12112)	6/14/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Respond to of 27311

<By the way, the Valence stock fraud closed lower again.> Duh, did you happen to notice how tech stocks did today in general? So when are you going to back up your fraud statements with a single fact? Any fraud supporting fact will do. C'mon Wee Willie, I dare ya! None of this FMK shill crap either. I double dog dare you (from the movie "A Christmas Story") to post some facts. I guess the record will continue to show that the only fraud here has the initials of WW.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (12112)	6/15/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Mr. Bill: >>You insist I provide proof of every statement I make<<. YUP, that about sums it up. Give me one good reason why I shouldn't demand proof. By your bombastic statement you tar yerself with the very same brush you would use against the long hypsters. To me this means you're either a fool at best, or a certain type of shill at worst. In any case, you're clearly no better than those you attempt to castigate because you provide the same amount of proof. NONE! Like I said, folks of your "ilk" are all alike. John~