Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Integral Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: daViking who wrote (978)	6/14/1999 9:54:00 PM
From: Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1108

David, IF YOU had read all the previous posts by the loyal ITKG investors, the answers to your questions would be available. I consider myself one of those investors who WILL remain loyal to this small company and I am confident that the Form 10 will be filed when it is the RIGHT time for ITKG, not YOU or me. David, according to the new SEC guidelines, when EXACTLY does ITKG need to file their Form 10 ??? Are they ahead of that deadline ???? PLease do some "due diligence" and report some FACTS, if you please. Thank you in advance ! Warm Regards, Chief

To: daViking who wrote (978)	6/15/1999 4:07:00 AM
From: KCMike	Respond to of 1108

David, I know your post was directed to Dennis P, but with your permission, I'd like to respond. I have followed ITKG since April of '98 and have owned ITKG stock since 1-12-99. I've invested a lot of time in this investment including having read 750 of the 979 post here on SI. My due diligence includes more than I can put on this page. Even with all this, there are those interested in this stock whose 'due diligence' makes mine pale in comparison. I respect their loyalty and commitment to ITKG. Having said that, I will only stay loyal to this company for as long as I believe in it. When I no longer believe in ITKG I will sell. Until then, I will endeavor to continue my due diligence by asking questions, making observation and drawing conclusions enabling me to learn more about this company. I am learning more. About the form 10, you have reason to be concerned. Concerned is not a bad word, in fact, if you were not you might be lax in your due diligence. My concern comes from the companies own time table, not mine. Each time I've called investor relations they have said the form 10 is 'ready to go', 'any day' or 'could be tomorrow or three weeks'. I can also count numerous recites by ITKG loyalist and other ITKG posters who have gotten the same responses, who've made similar projections. I've come to expect what I'm lead to believe, especially when it is from the company. Now, am I going to sell, I don't think so, but I will revaluate. I'm thinking this form 10 process could take longer than the company anticipates and this is why. I'm told being "current" is a serious complication. Because the form 10 must be current when filed, it requires the preparer to complete the work in the current quarter. If the preparer cannot complete this work in a timely basis, then the preparation and review process becomes a never-ending cycle of partial completion, incomplete review, and restart. In the meantime, the company is burning capital at a certain rate of $x/mth, plus the very large costs of the never-ending form 10 work. Not to be missed in the process is the capital-raising that occurs in the absence of the form 10. Lots of shares can be sold without disclosure of any kind. The Technology in practice? Last Saturday a friend and I took apart an IASCA house antenna to see how it works, it looked pretty simple. Of course, this is a different from the one ITKG uses on the smaller scale, but I think the concept is the same. I've ask ITKG to inform me of their participation in future electronics shows - they will get back to me. David, I don't know if I've helped, but feel free to respond or ask any questions. I've learned a lot from these posts of which Chief and others have made major contributions. Together we will learn more. KCMike