SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (83454)6/15/1999 1:32:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
PB,

Re:"This is not the bottom. Again, this is a dumb shrink part. I would expect the mobile .18 designs to be even lower voltage. I may be wrong, have to wait and see."

Clearly the "dumbshrink" didn't work out too well.

Intels std 0.18 process was going to be 1.5V.

So this "mobile" 0.18 part is just from the std. process.

The performance at the "true" mobile voltage of 1.3V must have been abysmal for them to "jack" up the voltage to 1.5V and the performance still sucks as the chips only run at 400Mhz.

They have a lot of process development to do if they want to start shipping laptop chips at 600Mhz in 3-4 months as promised.

Regards,

Kash



To: Process Boy who wrote (83454)6/15/1999 1:43:00 AM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
PB or anybody else,

Can you summarize common features and/or differences between Intel's FLASH and logic 0.18u processes in a way that a layman can understand?

Kap.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News