Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (12122)	6/15/1999 3:18:00 AM
From: Chisy	Respond to of 27311

You've baffled me with your footwork, which I wish I understood. Is there anyone here who could translate your post for me? In the meantime, a little TA from my perspective. VLNC, as per one of my favorite technicians, is in a five month contracting triangle. To me this along with the DD we know, is a bullish sign and should pop up and out of this triangle in a big way. This should be sooner rather than later IMO. I am long and all the usual disclaimers apply.

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (12122)	6/15/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: lws	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Hi, Rich, Thanks for your explanation. I have a further question which comes out of your description, which you may or may not be able to answer. Is the rapidity of response -- the squareness of the wave -- inherent in the battery chemistry, or is it a function of the electronics? I could imagine that such pulse characteristics could be achieved through some form of electronic buffering -- capacitors, say. The point of my question, of course, is to figure out whether there is something unique to Valence's product in this, or whether any battery could achieve the same result with its electronics. Again, thanks in advance -- and perhaps this should be directed to MKT_entropy too. Regards, lws