SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2brasil who wrote (32361)6/15/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: Valueman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
First Newsgroup review I've seen of the 6185 from Nokia:

" The reception on the 6185 is not on par with the 1920.It is also
inferior to the Touchpoint and the Startac.I am using it in the New
York Long Island Market.It appears to be about the same as the newer Q
phones signal sensitivity.It will drop calls in areas that the better
signal Sprint phones will not.That in itself makes it unacceptable to
me.The 6185 sister phone the 6160 also leaves a lot to be desired in
the RF reception area.The 6185 has all the great 6 series features and
user friendly menus.The display seems dated and does not show the date
as most cdma phones do.The phone is shipped with the giant lithium
battery which gives it a somewhat large heavy form factor.Nokia lovers
will probably like this product just because its a 6xx series.My advice
if you want a dual band with the signal sensitivity thats needed to
avoid dropped calls, hold on to your trusty Qualcomms or Sonys.Wait for
the dual band Touchpoint coming soon to a Sprint store near you.Finally
the remark made by Steve Punter concerning the Clearnet 6188 having a
better way of handling CDMA audio quirks appears to be premature.The
6185 and the 6188 share the same electonics and the 6185 does not break
new ground in CDMA audio quality."