Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lost1 who wrote (21284)	6/15/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: Von	Respond to of 34811

Solar is nuclear, thermo-nuclear, but it is useful... My MSGI boinked, I sold, it is now at a tempting buy level, but the chart looks terrible. Guess I will try to sit on my hands...

To: Lost1 who wrote (21284)	6/15/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Mr. BSL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34811

Hi Lost1. No offence taken. The fact is that nuclear power has the least negative impact on the environment of all the major fuel sources. However, it does not matter because the perception that all those little mushrooms could become one big mushroom has always been out there! Hydrocarbons are the past, present and future. Wood was this country's first fuel. Lots of carbon, not much hydrogen, very dirty. Next came coal. Less carbon, more hydrogen, cleaner than wood. Oil is cleaner than coal and natural gas is cleaner than oil. The next step is fuel cells - all hydrogen, no carbon. Wind, solar, nuclear, tidal etc are all nice tries but hydrocarbons are the only realistic option out there. To be on-topic, I'll do some research on companies that are becoming fuel cell plays! Regards, Dick