Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Daytrading Canadian stocks in Realtime -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Hamlin who wrote (16731)	6/15/1999 7:50:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 62348

Now that we have reached a new "plateau" in this discussion, let me say this! <ggg> If a person knowingly slanders another then they are liable for what they say. If the "offended person, is a person and not a company, then the person involved should sue "AT HIS EXPENSE" not using shareholder money....shareholder money is a bottomless pit...if they run out, they just issue more shares. If a company is "besmurched" then "THE SHAREHOLDERS" at an AGM should determine if a lawsuit is suitable or not. Not some pompous CEO who sits on his fat butt, taking stock options on the cheap, fixing up his insider buddies, while "producing Zero" for the shareholders!! Glad i got that off my chest!!<ggg> the Chief