Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SABRATEK CORP (SBTK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (139)	6/15/1999 9:52:00 PM
From: mod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 487

Why is my question so ridiculous? Doesn't Milberg Weiss et al employ investigators when needed to root out corporate evil? So why not just deny upfront that you are being compensated by Milberg Weiss? I promise to never mention it again if you will just go on the record that you have never been paid by them and will not be paid by them, in any fashion. <<As to you assumption that Millberg & Weiss would recklessly slander a company in a complaint, particularly using this much detail, and by so doing put themselves in a significant position of liability...>> First of all, slander is spoken, so you mean libel, which is written. And yes, I assume Milberg Weiss would make whatever outlandish claims they think will get them the biggest legal fees, as there is little risk to them. Even when class action suits are dismissed, no penalty is usually assessed for filing a false complaint. Lawyers are usually protected against libel claims in law suits. A sad failing of our legal system IMHO.