Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chip who wrote (15531)	6/15/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: BKLYN BOYZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Please to Translate into plain old english... Please skip the Mining jargon and lingo because Me and da' boyz barely got out of kindergarten. So speak S L O W L Y and C L E A R L Y . I am certain that all of us on the board will appreciate your efforts Thanks for your input./ brooklyn boyz

To: chip who wrote (15531)	6/15/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: J. Nelson	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 25548

CHB: That was ok. this caught my eye! Best part of confirmation in why it never was looked at for (9,200,000) years. From the House report....... >>>>The assay results returned on samples from the breccia were rather surprising in the extent and amount of mineralisation present, considering there was no surface expression of the mineralisation and the few surface samples taken in earlier programs had been disappointing. The extent and depth of the surface leaching and depletion in mineralisation was not expected to be so intense and complete, even for gold which is not expected to be removed to such an extent by surface weathering and leaching. The paucity of relict mineralisation in the surface exposures and outcrops certainly explains why the breccia pipe has not been intensively explored before now.<<<< Have a good night. Jim...