SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (83547)6/15/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Respond to of 186894
 
<Kash - re: Is cascades a different core?>

No, the same P6 core. As for the rest of your questions, I hope you get substantive answers. I have had hard time getting any answers on this thread lately. It is pretty easy to get flamed though.

Kap.



To: kash johal who wrote (83547)6/16/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
kash - <Anyway whats the difference between a PIII coppermine and cascades.>

Coppermine and Cascades are not the same die. Not sure of the feature differences.

PB



To: kash johal who wrote (83547)6/16/1999 1:06:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Kash, I think Tom may have got his information confused. From what I know already, Coppermine is P6 core w/ 256K on-die cache, and Cascades is the same thing except with 1MB on-die cache. I think the processors can either run on 100 or 133 MHz buses.

I don't know if there'll be a Slot 2 version of Coppermine. It would make sense, considering the number of dual-Slot-2 motherboards out there.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News