SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E*Trade (NYSE:ET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: italiana who wrote (7177)6/16/1999 12:43:00 AM
From: Spytrdr  Respond to of 13953
 
June 16, 1999


Gates Says He Expects Further Gains
In Productivity Through Technology

By JOHN R. WILKE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates told a congressional panel that the burst of productivity growth brought by computers is just beginning.

"We will absolutely see productivity increases coming out of the use of technology for many years to come," Mr. Gates said. "We are very much at the beginning of what can be done," he said, predicting that "in the next five years, we will make radical progress in the business sector."


Gates Testifies
Microsoft's CEO Bill Gates says the software industry's contribution to the U.S. economy will be greater than any other kind of manufacturing by 2000.



Mr. Gates spoke to the Joint Economic Committee a day after Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan told the same panel that "something special has happened to the American economy in recent years" because of computerization. But Mr. Greenspan also warned that technology's effect on productivity "can't increase indefinitely."

Increasing productivity lets wages rise and the economy grow faster without triggering inflation. While computers have been around for years, the economy-wide pace of productivity growth didn't quicken until the mid-1990s; some economists say that is because businesses are linking computers into networks, making them more efficient.

Some Echoes of Greenspan

Mr. Gates said he agreed with Mr. Greenspan's caution. "Chairman Greenspan is pointing out that some of the valuation may not continue to go up at the rate they've gone up," he said, referring to stock prices. "And if you take a long view, there will be some ups and downs in terms of the psychology of those valuations. But underneath that, the efficiencies and benefits to consumers will continue to advance," Mr. Gates said.

Productivity Gains From Technology May Reach Limit, Greenspan Warns (June 15)

Mr. Gates applauded "the light hand of government" in regulating high-technology industries, saying that "the framework we have in the U.S. encourages competition."

He referred only indirectly to the government's antitrust suit now pending in federal court a few blocks away. In response to a question about antitrust and government interference in technology, he said, "The laws as they are currently written are fine," though he saw some room for "tweaking."

Briefly addressing a main point of the lawsuit, he said that one of the freedoms companies have is "integrating new features in" products. "That kind of freedom has been upheld again and again, whether it's for large companies or small companies," he said. A crucial issue in the case is whether Microsoft illegally placed its own Internet browser into its dominant Windows software in order to hurt a rival browser maker.

Pitches for Legislation

Mr. Gates also pitched a number of legislative initiatives sought by technology companies: changes in tax policy to support research; protection for companies from lawsuits seeking damages over year-2000 computer glitches; and changes in immigration laws to allow more skilled foreign workers to come to the U.S.


Mr. Gates also backed giving U.S. companies greater flexibility to export encrypted software, saying that "the industry is losing a lot of sales" to foreign competitors.

In recent weeks, some senators have studied bringing all these issues together in omnibus technology legislation. In the House, Majority Leader Dick Armey announced Tuesday what he called an "e-Contract" package of bills for the technology industry, modeled on the "Contract With America" approach used in 1994.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Armey said that in addition to the technology issues already under consideration, the Texas Republican would like to "modernize" antitrust laws for today's high-tech markets. "The barriers to competition in technology are lower, and the industry is changing faster than antitrust cases can be pursued," she said. The legislation has nothing to do with the Microsoft case, she added.

Mr. Armey, whose former chief of staff now works for Microsoft, had lunch with Mr. Gates and other Republican leaders Tuesday shortly before announcing the "e-Contract."

Mr. Gates's appearance was a triumph for Republicans, who have benefited from large political contributions by Microsoft and its political action committee in the year since the antitrust suit was filed. Traditionally, Democrats -- especially Vice President Al Gore -- have been better at winning contributions from technology companies.



To: italiana who wrote (7177)6/16/1999 1:36:00 AM
From: Spytrdr  Respond to of 13953
 
June 15, 1999


The 'Net Puts Banks and Brokers to the Test

By Vito J. Racanelli

Editor's Note: Today's special Internet Week Weekday Trader focuses on the 'Net's impact on financial services.


It's a truism that technological revolutions create new industries almost overnight. But the most important changes often can't be predicted at all.

Just as the internal combustion engine eventually led to the U.S. interstate highway system, drive-in banking windows and airbag safety systems, the rise of the Internet will transform businesses in ways that we can't imagine now.


The financial services industry is at ground zero for these changes. Banks, brokerages and insurance companies could be unrecognizable in five to ten years.

The impact of the Internet was hammered home on Wall Street recently, when Merrill Lynch, once an outspoken opponent of online trading, announced that it, too, would offer its own Web-based system at commissions far below its traditional full service fees. Since that bombshell dropped, brokerage stocks have fallen sharply from their highs; banking and most other financial service stocks haven't performed well all year.

Merrill's surprise move, however, marks only beginning of the next phase for online financial services: a competitive free-for-all to get into every home in America. For those that get with the program early enough, the Internet will provide a great opportunity. Everyone else will be toast.

Why financial services? Because it's expected to be a boom industry of the next decade, thanks to the rapid accumulation of private wealth and increased interest by the public in investing, says Arnold Danielson of Danielson Associates, an independent industry consultant.

For banks and insurance companies, in particular, the Internet effectively "commoditizes" many conventional sources of revenue, says Danielson. With the click of a mouse, consumers will be able to compare interest rates on savings accounts and mortgages and premiums on auto and home insurance. Nasty price wars and a squeeze on profit margins is inevitable, he adds.

And it's happening quickly. A recent report by CIBC World Markets said Web-based mortgage origination revenue will explode to 25%-30% of this $1.4-trillion market by 2005, from less than 1% last year. Meanwhile, the average loan margin -- the revenue an originator receives as a percentage of the total loan -- will plummet to 0.75% from 1.25%, the report predicts.

On the plus side, the Internet should help cut the costs of maintaining bank accounts, says Invesco Strategic Financial Services Fund manager Jeff Morris. Indeed, a recent report by consulting firm Booz, Allen & Hamilton estimated that the average cost per transaction over the Internet was less than 1% of the average cost of a branch transaction and only about 4% of the average cost of using an ATM.

More importantly, there will be sources of revenue for banks that use the Internet effectively, asserts Morris. Banks that lead the Internet charge will take market share, he predicts. Credit card operations, for instance, can do more customized marketing of products and get better and faster feedback, he says.

Yet size will still matter, says Danielson. "The major players -- a small group after the recent wave of mergers -- will dominate the game," he predicts. Danielson picks Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank One as the banks best positioned to exploit the Web.


At Monday's close of 39 11/16, shares of Wells Fargo trade at 18 times First Call's consensus estimates of $2.22 per share in 1999, a discount to the 27% earnings growth expected this year. They also change hands at about 15x 2000 estimates of $2.57 per share, which is a projected 16% rise from 1999. Meanwhile, Citigroup shares trade at 16x consensus profit estimates of $2.63 per share this year and at 14x next year's estimates of $2.98, roughly in line with the company's long-term expected earnings growth of 14%.

Of the major banks, Danielson singles out Bank America and First Union, "with their large branch networks and a lot of deposits," as the most vulnerable to Internet banking. But the biggest losers of all may be small and mid-sized banks in the U.S. "This is a scale business, and smaller institutions won't be able to compete, " Bank One president and CEO John McCoy predicted at a recent banking conference. That should step up pressures toward even further consolidation in banking.

In the brokerage industry, online trading, whose commissions can be as little as ten percent of what full-service brokers charge, will squeeze the traditional brokers, says Invesco's Morris. And CIBC estimates that online brokerage accounts will more than triple to 25 million by 2001-2002, from fewer than seven million last year.

Full-service brokers that remain complacent risk losing many potential new clients, and may have to pay even more to woo them later. Firms like PaineWebber and A.G. Edwards have been slow to offer online trading. Even Merrill -- despite being hailed for suddenly "embracing the 'Net" -- will go through some pain making the transition over the next year or two, Morris says.

The difference in market valuations is telling. Charles Schwab shares change hands at 61x consensus estimates of $1.33 per share this year, a 57% increase in earnings from 1998, and at 50x 2000 estimates of $1.62 (a 22% gain from 1999). Meanwhile, Merrill stock trades at only about 13x 1999 estimates of $5.21 per share in 1999 at 12.5x estimates of $5.33 per share next year. Schwab's 22% projected long-term growth is nearly twice that of Merrill.


Even online brokers aren't immune to the competitive pressures they've helped create. Merrill's move is certainly a shot across their bow, and any serious market correction could discourage many new investors who have flocked to online trading. (On Monday, shares of Schwab, E*Trade Group and Ameritrade fell sharply on news of lower online trading volume in May by Schwab customers.)

Ironically, the Internet may push online and traditional brokers closer together in some ways. While full-service firms slash their fees for online trades, online brokers are now moving up market with products and services like research and advice in an effort to snare wealthier -- and more profitable -- clients.

For traditional brokers that can leverage the technology properly, there are "huge opportunities," says Jim Folwell, a consultant at Cerulli Associates, a Boston-based research firm that specializes in brokerages. He likens the situation to what movie-theater operators went through with the advent of the VCR 20 years ago. Theaters survived by adding more screens and seats, improved the sound and increased admission and concession prices, he says. (It's arguable whether the movies have gotten better, though.)

The full-service firms will have to provide a menu of services and prices for different customers, he says. Folwell singles out Prudential as one of the leaders among traditional brokers with a "wide range" of account offerings and pricing. In the long run, he says, the Internet will take over a broker's more mundane responsibilities -- like giving out stock quotes and news -- thereby freeing up time for more profitable activities. That should make individual brokers more productive, he says.

Because of the Internet, everything is up for grabs in the once-staid financial services industry. But by the time every home in America is wired to the Internet, only the companies that make the best use of new technologies -- and do it early enough -- will still be around to profit from it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday: Weekday Trader looks at the impact of the Internet on health care.

What do you think? Please e-mail comments to hgold@online.barrons.com.