SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chisy who wrote (12173)6/16/1999 2:22:00 AM
From: MGV  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
"I have been led ...."

Now you see, that is a big part of your problem - Use your own head! Think for yourself! Otherwise you can add a ("b") to the last word in your fragment above. "I have been (b)led ..."

Its a chore having to bring this up again but, you all realize that the stock price is merely exactly 7/16 higher than when I first posted here on 6/29/98. .4375/6.25 = 7%
The point here is that it was just so predictable. All of the risk, all of the volatility, and what do you get for risking all of your equity? Not much more than the return earned on a riskless asset.



To: Chisy who wrote (12173)6/16/1999 2:52:00 AM
From: FMK  Respond to of 27311
 
Chisy, Good point. Some of the patent sleuths may be able to shed some light on that subject. Lev did say that he expects any competitor will have difficulties getting too far without stepping on one of Valence's patents, especially with the large (laptop size) batteries. I don't remember Electrofuel being mentioned as serious contenders. If they infringe and manage to develop substantial revenues, Valence might be entitled to disgorge all profits plus penalties.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News