To: coldhardtruth who wrote (3123 ) 6/16/1999 4:44:00 PM From: augustus Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13056
coldhardtruth, race mixing is an absolute necessity if you want this country to survive in a viable form. I don't believe in cultural diversity, it is a recipe for disaster. I also believe that it can be incredibly beneficial. The risks inherent in this diversity simply outweigh the benefits in my opinion. (ie Amazing/wonderful progress because of synergy is no good to me if I, or my children, have to live through x years of civil war/unrest). Race mixing can/will provide some limited stability. As to who gets to diddle whom, I think I understand your thinking process. Women, like everything else, are a resource to be fought over. You are trying re-define the rules in the process, ie. include yourself and exclude others, thereby giving you and yours a better chance at survival. That's a natural and smart tactic (practiced by every sane human being), but it isn't beneficial to the country as a whole, and you can expect some major resistance by those with vested interests. T {Part of the ejaculate seems to consists of blocking sperms (not fully accepted), which as their names implies block the sperm of those who'll come after you. (pun intended :) Also, the shape of the penis seems to be very effective in removing previously deposited ejaculate (hence the thrusting motions). Eliminating/obstructing rivals is a time-honored tradition.} Now, from my perspective, your arguments will be irrelevant in a couple of centuries. I look at the trends in plastic surgery and genetic engineering and conclude that in no time at all the human race will be unrecognizable. You'll have 'people' looking like animals, machines and who the heck knows what the fads'll be. Basically, I believe that anyone, given the cash, will be able to, and will, look like anything they want to look like. Unlike some of the other folks on the board, I don't have a problem with your attitude. If you believe in hybrid vigor, then I don't see how you can argue against "attitudenal vigor". For me they are all part nature's provisions for ensuring that most important thing of all: survival of the species. Hope I didn't read you wrong. Regards, Augustus