Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY (MKTY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WWS who wrote (224)	6/16/1999 10:31:00 PM
From: Sid Turtlman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542

bill: This isn't anti-PEM. One could be totally pro-PEM, and conclude that household size fc's make no economic sense, and would be bought be very few people even if they did. That is Ballard's viewpoint; that is why Ballard is trying to produce 250 kW fc's for stationary power. You don't think Ballard could come up with a better and cheaper 7 kW unit than Plug Power if it thought there was any real market there? Forget molten carbonate, if you want. One 250 kW PEM unit to serve 36 homes has to be way cheaper than 36 individual 7 kW fc units, with 36 batteries, 36 reformers, 36 inverters, 36 visits by electricians and plumbers to hook up the electric and gas, etc., doesn't it?