Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (1715)	6/16/1999 6:15:00 PM
From: manny t	Respond to of 10027

S&P, First of all,notice that I replied to Zurdo before your message to me. However,Zurdo does deserve to receive some flack,because his non-stop posting,was not voicing an opinion,but rather a concerted effort to bash NITE so that the stock goes down,or at least influence us not to buy. I am sure that I am speaking for other people on this THREAD who resented his non-stop posting. If not for anything else, I think he deserves some of this bashing himself. Manny T

To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (1715)	6/16/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: Stephen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10027

S&P as per my previous posts, whilst we are all responsible for our actions (or non-actions), I find it reprehensible for shorts to repeat post negatives to a thread without saying anything new. I do not believe this tactic is ethically valid - and it really turns people off reading the thread - which is everyone's medium for communication - not for propoganda. As I said previously, 22 of 52 posts to this thread in less than a day, repeatedly saying the same thing is not what SI exists for and should not be condoned by anyone. Negatively influencing people by this tactic actually deserves getting thrown off SI imho. Stephen