Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis V. who wrote (12195)	6/16/1999 8:04:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Market inefficiency is one thing. Deaf, dumb, and blind is quite another. You wake up.

To: Dennis V. who wrote (12195)	6/16/1999 8:16:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

Dennis, there is no arguing with MGV's fundamental derangement. He has trouble relating to people. It seems the attacks come at random. Could it be when he gets off his medication?? Psychosis has no reason or reality. Let him rant and howl at the moon....

To: Dennis V. who wrote (12195)	6/16/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

A straightforward and manifestly objective Yahoo post worth considering. Sorry, not a Valence tout by: newbattery (40/M/Germantown, WI) 12241 of 12262 Sorry Yorner, guess I don't understand what these boards are for. Would you rather have me create imaginative calculations that speculate on nonexistant batteries that we hope Valence could manufacture someday? Or maybe I should relate all the 'news' my super secret, in the know sources have told me about the hundred million dollar contracts that will be signed next week. I am long this stock. I just can't stand wading through the tons of BS that gets posted on this board and at SI. 90% of it is nothing but wishful thinking and it has already cost me money expecting that there was some validity to it. I just want to make sure anyone new to this board recognizes how often the reputable sounding stock hypesters have been wrong in the past. Many, many times.