Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (15576)	6/16/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Grateful Reaper	Respond to of 25548

You just don't quit, do you? "I'm quite sure Mr. House knows who butters his bread, but that does not make him a bad guy, and it doesn't make him dishonest." Your phrase "Mr. House knows who butters his bread," implies bias which implies a lack of credibility. If you believe Gordon House is biased and lacks credibility, if you believe that any part of his report is not credible, why don't you have the guts to say so directly instead of relying on your slimy little implications? Because you are a cowardly manipulator who is afraid of getting sued for defamation. I believe you still owe an apology to all concerned. Almost all of your posting is done on MDHM and NPEC boards and yet you claim to have no financial interests here. That is not credible. Who butters your bread, Wing-fat?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (15576)	6/16/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: chip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Does it mean Mr. House is lying? Absolutely not. This isn't an exact science, and there is plenty of room for both optimistic and pessimistic interpretations. I'm quite sure Mr. House knows who butters his bread, but that does not make him a bad guy, and it doesn't make him dishonest. I'm not sure I understand your problem here. The way to prove the assets has to be through qualified experts. My impression is that everyone agrees Gordon House fulfills that requirement. I suppose it would be better if some party of equal or better stature who was not hired by Medinah came in for independent verification. But I'm also assuming that if its true his reports are being gone over by parties interested in the properties they must be satisfied enough with his qualifications and feel he's not catering solely to Medinah's wishes. They must feel his reports are objective enough to use them to decide whether they'd like to move on to the next stages, or it seems to me they'd demand something or someone else. Chip

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (15576)	6/16/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Kenneth R. Moss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Witless-LOSER-drip, <<<<Funny you should mention OJ; this isn't a whole heck of a lot different than getting an expert witness. Does it mean Mr. House is lying? Absolutely not. This isn't an exact science, and there is plenty of room for both optimistic and pessimistic interpretations. I'm quite sure Mr. House knows who butters his bread, but that does not make him a bad guy, and it doesn't make him dishonest. >>>>> You are coming awful close to making someone think you have done some DD on this company. Is is a science or not ??? Would Mr. House only show optimistic interpretations ??? Do you disagree with Mike Gold that it is not a glowing report ??? If you do disagree, please tell the thread why !!! <<<<<Like most here, I have a job. Don't you?>>>> We all feel you have a job, just who are you working for??? Regards, Kenneth R. Moss