SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (62135)6/17/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1571430
 
kash - <Now tell us more why Intel has the worlds slowest 0.18 micron process>

I believe Intel has one of the worlds only running .18 processes at the moment.

Due to the recent announcement about Coppermine delay, I expect to be a sitting duck target. Of course, I will probably just have to take it, as I won't be able to provide any more detail than Intel press releases. Which is frustrating. Particularly the correlation between the Dixon QS and the Coppermine. There are leaps in logic going on here that ostensibly seem plausible, but in fact are not entirely accurate. Anyway, fire when ready. I've got my flak jacket on.

PB



To: kash johal who wrote (62135)6/19/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 1571430
 
Krash,

Re: "Suffice it to say all wafer foundries such as TSMC, UMC, CSM offer
dual gate options on their deep sub-micron processess."

I don't think I ever said that these companies didn't offer a "dual gate"
process technology, Krash ... Just that some designers can get around
the need for it with circuit design techniques. Krash, please try to
stay "civil", TIA

Make It So,
Yousef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News