Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taz who wrote (551)	6/17/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1239

By: chimpleton Reply To: None Thursday, 17 Jun 1999 at 3:40 PM EDT Post # of 586 I would like to respond to Taz on si. How deep were the holes that the company just drilled? Over what part of the ore body did Inco block out the tonnage? Where did the company drill on the property now? Is it more likely that grades will improve at depth(usually the case)? What was the deepest hole Inco drilled? Why did Inco hold the property for 40 years? Why would Inco let the property go for not paying $1000 in assesments? Can you please respond to these questions? Taz, talk to the analyst at David Williams and Associates, London and at Bunting Warburg in Toronto. Also Tracey Hurley at Wolverton in Vancouver. There will be more added to the list in the coming weeks. Also it may be worth your time talk to Dr. Nick Carter, PHD, as he is the one that wrote the reports on the property. Please phone around and check his credentials and reputation. I believe you will find they are impressive and he is well respected in the mining industry. Also, if you are in Vancouver, or have someone you trust that resides there, send them in to have a look at the project. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain.