Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (29174)	6/17/1999 2:07:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Ummm - how do you know? Edit: I see you said, let's not go there. But I really want to know.

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (29174)	6/17/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: nihil	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

WARNING: this is pretty basic male anatomy. Well, where I come from, nice heterosexual boys don't stand around comparing the length of erect penises. As far as flaccid ones go, I offer as exhibit one "The Creation of Adam" by Michelangelo. God has his night-shirt on, although he is grabbing a little putti titty. Adam appears to be poorly hung, but it looks like an inch of empty foreskin to me. Of course, in "Expulsion from the Garden" (exhibit 2) (that the one where Eve is turning away, possibly from administering a blow-job to Adam while still touching Satan) Adam looks as if he only has an unfilled half inch of foreskin, but he is very thick (compared to other paintings) so he is probably detumescing slowly. Michelangelo was very interested in sexual organs, but a later Pope had them covered with wisps of cloth. ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''