SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (62142)6/17/1999 2:14:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572154
 
Re: "Actually if there are problems with Intel's 0.18u process then AMD had nothing to do with it."

Based on my analysis of Intel's .18u process problems I'd have to say that Intel will need to develop a "rev.2" .18u process in order to reach speed over 300 MHz errr... 1 GHz, IMHO. <GGGG>

Make it slow,
Youseless



To: kapkan4u who wrote (62142)6/17/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: RDM  Respond to of 1572154
 
<Actually if there are problems with Intel's 0.18u process then AMD had nothing to do with it. Except, may be, they helped to foster the arrogant attitudes on the part of Intel's process designers.>

Arrogant attitudes may hidden for some time if there is no competition to drive the new product introduction schedule.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News