Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (53459)	6/17/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<<"PBA babies are no longer dependent on the mother's body." Incorrect...talk to an OBGYN. Infants are still physically dependent on the Mother/Owner even after the "birth", although not in the "interconnected blood supply" sense.>> What about babies that are taken by C section when the mother is dying or the children of mothers who died in childbirth. Is that child dependent on it's dead mother? What are those mothers doing physically for their babies. What about babies who are taken away at birth and given up for adoption? Since those children couldn't have survived the stories about mother/child reunions must all be made up.