SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/17/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: accountclosed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Your post is an excellent post. Tremendous set of points. A definite addition to the debate at this crossroads for the thread.



To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/17/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Excellent post..Some parts had me ROFLMAO!

Now, you want to buy my gold shares off of me?



To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/17/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: per strandberg  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 86076
 
Robert,

Yes, your analysis is sound, the facts are true, Y2K IS coming...

But performing a probability-magnitude analysis, I am able to state with 99.987% probability that I have foregone some seemingly easy gains on the upside and the magnitude of my losses on puts to avoid being completely wiped out in a severe correction is approaching 99.987% and has caused me to be completely wiped out without a severe correction.

My mathematical studies of the wavelet market theory has been 99.987%
correct, alas for a minus sign somewhere, which has always put me
on the wrong side of the market trend. Trying to use myself as a contrary indicator didn't work as this caused an endless recursive
loop in the program.

When CPQ warned about $0.15 loss instead of a $0.20 profit and turned
green on my screen after an hour, I decided to change the direction
of my research. I will now try to discover the laws governing the
seemingly irrational movements of schools of fish and flocks of sheep.

It will be called the "Black Sheep - Fisher Shoals" - theorem.

The complete thesis will be posted when finished, so that we
can learn from our mistakes and repeat them with 99.987% accuracy.

Good Luc!
Per S




To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/17/1999 7:19:00 PM
From: NickSE  Respond to of 86076
 
Ho ho ho...no more bears left around here...everyone aboard the bull train to dow 20k...-s-

members.home.net

Nick



To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/17/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 86076
 
Robert would like to include in your deduction the "side effects" of the over funded pension plans due the market rise, who are also reported as corporate profits.

So maybe your 6% is even less than that depending on the industry.

Now any meaningful market crash will negatively impact corporate earnings as pension plans may start to be under funded and that liability deducted from profits.

so we may spiral down

BWDIK
Haim



To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/18/1999 9:02:00 AM
From: re3  Respond to of 86076
 
To Robert-

i don't believe luc's spirit is broken...he just has a different ghost writer...

nothing wrong with being selectively long , one can make hay both ways, being long on intc is no being deal, and toutathons cannot be fought...see mu for details...

a true conspiracy will implode anyway

some of the 'heroes' really don't want to discuss, just pontificate

poots are for suckers...

ike



To: Robert who wrote (47879)6/20/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Robert, Excellent Post and the VIX adds some Lumber to your Fire -g-

To all you VIX watchers,

In the last hour today, VIX moved to its lowest level of the year, and
with the exception of the closes on November 20 and 23, 1998 and
December 23, 1998, the lowest level since the July 1998 price highs.
Draw your own conclusions, Maybe the May 13 VIX reading was not too high to mark a market top at
the time. So far, of course, that has marked the all-time high.



To: Robert who wrote (47879)8/19/1999 1:19:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005  Respond to of 86076
 
After selectively browsing through the past notes on this thread, I do hereby award your above post (#reply-10165381) post of the month for July 1999. You successfully nailed the market top, at least for the time being! -g-

To anybody who wish to contest this award, you should prove your worth - otherwise no contest allowed! -g-