Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (664)	6/17/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: mark garner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

as you know, i had my reasons for PMing you, whether my opinion was right or wrong. i did not ask you to post here. you were mad that i accused you of being a poster on raging bull, so you decided that you had to "get back at me" and started posting here again. i believe that that is a pretty accurate description. now, for the sake of arguement, lets say thats water under the bridge. so, are you willing to agree that if nobody responds or uses your name here that you will not post your repetitious commentary and that you will only post about a new newsworthy event concerning FCM? if you can agree to that, i am sure that everyone here will agree not to post about you. fair enough? now, i do have a final question for you and would like an honest answer: do you post under raging bull under an alias? i know there are a few people who believe that you do. at this point, i really dont care if you do. i just want you to agree to the same thing on ragingbull if you agree to it here.

To: Noneyet who wrote (664)	6/17/1999 8:48:00 PM
From: Salt'n'Peppa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

Baloney, Mr. Thomas DeSousa! <<< ...as I have said many times to just leave my name out of any posts here and I would not post. I kept my word,... >>> I call your attention to your post #606, in which you sarcastically attack Mark Garner (post #605) on his understanding of the term "discovery". Your name was not mentioned anywhere in post #605, yet you generously enlightened everyone with your opinions. You are correct in that you didn't post on FCM from May 27-June 10. Funnily enough, in this time, only 40 posts were made - that is less than 3 per day! Your response, in your return to the thread on June 10, was to Daine Newman (post #559). If I am not mistaken, your name is nowhere to be seen in that post either. I doubt that anyone uses you as an excuse for FCM's performance. This appears to be a somewhat egotistical notion. On a lighter note... ...is it any accident that you posted message #666? You clearly exhibit "the force", but I feel that you may have strayed over to the "dark side". LOL You can never find a Yoda when you need one! S&P