SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kemble s. matter who wrote (133317)6/17/1999 8:59:00 PM
From: Morgan Drake  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 176387
 
All. OT somewhat. Major Problem with Options. Need some Help on this one.

Here's the deal.

I have 200 contracts (covering 20,000 shares) of Qualcomm July 60 calls. These are American as opposed to European options. When I saw that the stock closed at 119 and 15/16s, I called my broker (E*Trade) and said I wanted to exercise the options. As I was light 1/16 X 20,000 shares, I reckoned I would just pony up the $625 and have all 20,000 shares exercised.

The math is as follows:

20,000 shares at $119.9375 = $2,398,750 (market value)
20,000 shares at $60 call price = $1,200,000 due seller of calls for stock

A market value of $2,398,750 will support a 50% margin loan = to $1,199,375. Since $1,200,000 is needed to pay off the option seller, I would need to come up with $625 in cash ($1,200,000 - $1,199,375 = $625). With E*Trade's margin loan of 50% equal to $1,199,375 of the market value of the 20,000 shares, and my $625, I should be home free.

Well, here's what happened. When I called the E*Trade broker he said, "Nope. You need to have the entire $1.2 million in your account to do this deal." I said, "Wait a minute, you automatically exercised my 3,000 May 70s last month when the market value was $100/share. The gross market value of that trade was $300,000; the cost of the trade was $70/sh. X 3,000 shares, or $210,000. You then advanced $210,000 to pay for that stock, because there was no cash in the account to do the trade, without my even asking, and then you gave me a margin call because the loan-to-value ratio was 70%. I then sold off 1,300 shares to be in compliance with your margin requirements, getting the loan-to-value ratio back into the 50% range. Now you're telling me you can't exercise this position because I don't have the $1.2 million in the account."

They checked around and came back and said I would be "free riding" if they were to do this, because the $1.2 million was not presently in my account to pay for the exercise. I explained that this wasn't free riding because the stock wasn't being sold to me for $120, but rather for $60, and that my equity was the spread between the two. I further explained that if I were to walk 20,000 shares of QCOM into my account free and clear of any encumbrances, then they would advance me $1.2 million. The result would be the same: $2.4 million in stock value, $1.2 million in my equity and $1.2 million in their margin loan. They agreed. They then said, however, that it was their policy to advance at expiration, but not before. I asked them for documentation of that policy. They said "Hang on a minute, and we'll get it for you." Ten minutes later they came back on the line and said they couldn't find any written policy, but they were a "cash up front" firm and they were sure they couldn't do business like that, unless the options were at expiration, and then they would do business like that automatically exercising my options and fronting the margin loan without my even asking.

I said, "Look, just give me the number of the CEO in Palo Alto. I call him and settle this up." Ten more minutes expired and then they came back on the line and said they'll have the local (Atlanta) head of their margin department get back to me in the morning before the market opens.

I might add, that all parties to these conversations agreed with the logic and economics of my position at all times.

Any suggestions for tomorrow, thread?

Thanx,

Morgan




To: kemble s. matter who wrote (133317)6/17/1999 9:05:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Asian PC market: From Tumult to Recovery.

Hi Kemble
Here is some interesting news from the East.
====================================

"After two very tumultuous years, the regional PC market appears to be firmly planted on the path of recovery," said IDC Asia-Pacific research manager Brian Kornegay.

==================================

Published on Tuesday, June 15, 1999
PERSONAL COMPUTING

Mainland leads the charge as Asia-Pacific PC sales jump 24pc

XIAO-FEI ZHANG

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asia-Pacific is seeing signs of recovery, at least in the market for personal computers.

PC sales in the region, excluding Japan, jumped 24 per cent in the first quarter of this year, according to International Data Corp (IDC) figures.

Sales gains were supported by continuing growth in key countries such as the mainland, Australia, India and Taiwan.

PC shipments amounted to 2.95 million units in the first quarter, compared with 2.37 million during the first quarter last year. In US dollar terms, that was a 29 per cent increase to $4.3 billion from $3.3 billion.

It was the highest increase in PC sales in Asia, excluding Japan, since 1996, when sales grew more than 30 per cent.

"There are two reasons for this," said Kitty Fok, Asia-Pacific PC research manager for IDC.

"One is because China and India sustained high growth even during the financial crisis. The second is because Asia is recovering from the financial crisis."

The mainland, which accounted for 34.6 per cent of the total regional shipments, and India, which accounted for 9.1 per cent, grew 22 and 35 per cent respectively.

Both countries were more or less sheltered from the currency devaluation which stormed through Asia last year.

As for recovering economies, South Korea made a huge comeback. Its PC market surged more than 50 per cent in the first quarter, compared with the same period last year - from 281,000 shipments to 424,000.

"The Korean Government bought a lot of PCs," said Ms Fok. "Home PCs were also strong."

As for individual vendors, IBM beat Compaq, selling 174,000 units in this quarter, or 8.7 per cent of market share.

The mainland's largest PC-maker, Legend, took third place with 174,000 units, followed closely by Samsung. Both were about 6 per cent market share. Hewlett-Packard finished fifth.

"Both Legend and Samsung cater only to their own local markets. Their growth is bolstered primarily by the growth in both China and Korea," Ms Fok said.

As a result of the strong first-quarter results, IDC increased its regional forecast for this year to 12.9 million units shipped, more than 23 per cent annual growth.

"After two very tumultuous years, the regional PC market appears to be firmly planted on the path of recovery," said IDC Asia-Pacific research manager Brian Kornegay.

(Courtesy:Technology Post)