SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cacaito who wrote (10502)6/18/1999 12:26:00 AM
From: aknahow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
Cacacito, thanks so much for the analysis.

I have thought of a motive for not telling us the trial has been concluded, if that is the case. The motive would be to make what someone considers a blockbuster announcement which combines the I-Prex deal with Trauma trial termination.

REMEMBER EVERYONE THIS IS SIMPLY A MENTAL EXERCISE. MAKE ALL YOUR BUY AND SELL DECISIONS BASED ON THE POST OF ROBERT K UNLESS HE TELLS YOU OTHERWISE.

I oppose waiting to combine the announcements. However there is another reason for the combination. As independent releases each is picked to pieces and made to seem less important. The result is less of a market impact than one would expect. But when two variables are combined in the same release the mind accepts the entire message as super positive.<g>

At any rate whenever XOMA stops providing accrual data on any future trial, I am going to posit that the trial has been halted. <g>



To: Cacaito who wrote (10502)6/21/1999 10:08:00 AM
From: aknahow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
The P II Trauma trial dosage for the first 400 was 4 mg per Kg of weight for 2
days. In the continued phase of P II I believe they tried some different dosage regimes.
One I have seen for Jan of 98 mentioned 3 days.

My question is do we know what dosage is being used and for how many days in the P
III trial. Admit I don't know what mental use I will make out of this information but I
would like to know nonetheless. From a lay persons view even understand that at times
less is more, in general it is had knot to believe that more and longer is better.

Will probably ask Martin, if there is no answer already available. The ISS scores for
the treatment arm were a lot lower than for the placebo arm so it is not that clear how
significant the positive results were.

Why not a continuous infusion? Why just two days? Is the threat of infection and
endotoxin over in two days? Is it not cost effective to do more? Will certain conditions
be treated differently? Just searching for questions that make sense and will shed some
light on benefit to the patient, and market for the product. Obviously for chronic
conditions XOMA is already looking for ways to provide the drug on a continuos basis.
Perhaps an acute condition is taken care of in two days, three days and thats that. ????



To: Cacaito who wrote (10502)6/21/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Cacaito, see the 1998 'last update", date and the reference to 3 days. This does not mean I am sure it refers to P III. Provided only to show the background for my question.

The Pharmacokinetic and Immunological Effects of two Treatment
Regimens of Bactericidial/Permeability-Increasing Protein in
Patients With Hemorrhage Due to Trauma

Principal Investigator: Seth Izenberg, M.D.

Sponsor: XOMA Corporation

Volunteers

Gender: Male or Female
Age: Adults
Eligibility: Trauma who receive 2 units of blood
Exclusions: Spinal cord injury, head injury, abdominal cancer

Description of Research:

Protein that causes bacteria cell wall to become permeable allowing study drug and antibiotics to
kill bacteria. Drug is given IV over 3 day with PK sample collection. Study is placebo controlled.

USA Protocol Number: 96-184

Primary Disease Category: Trauma

Keyword(s): Blood loss, trauma

Experimental Drug/Device: Bactericidial/permeability-increasing protein

CONTACT/REFERRAL INFORMATION:

Physician referrals are encouraged: YES

Patient inquiries are encouraged: YES

For more information about this research please contact:


Name:
Cathy Blache/Tootie Wright

Email:
None

Address:
2451 Fillingim Street
Surgery Department
Mastin 700
Mobile, AL 36617

Phone:
(334)471-7988

Fax:
(334)470-5827



University of South Alabama
Clinical Trial Information (last update 1/27/98)

To the Investigators Page | To the Department/Specialty Page

To the Clinical Trials Homepage | To the College of Medicine Homepage



To: Cacaito who wrote (10502)6/21/1999 11:56:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Martin said that during the continuation part of P II they tried other dosages etc. But the original methodology used in P II is exactly what is used in P III.

Nice "new" biotech site, for those that have not seen it. Nice old site for those that have.

bioportfolio.com