To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (5676 ) 6/18/1999 5:02:00 PM From: Farfel Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7342
Then SELL Catherine: there is also a maxim which says: "Scared money never makes money." And as for your quoting Lynch exactly where does he say:"...(as I think Peter Lynch said) just because the stock goes up, that doesn't mean you were right. Just because it goes down, that doesn't mean you were wrong."----I read most of his stuff and never heard him say that. And exactly who ever told you that:" just because a stock goes up it doesn't mean you're right"----that's the most muddled concept I have ever heard. Of course it means you are right if "stock appreciation" is your goal. Luckily this is not a humanities class in which every opinion is considered only as valid as another opinion: in this arena there is an objective result and standard by which our opinions are tested---the price of the stock (and that is something which Peter Lynch does agree with and so does William O'Neill) and if the price of the stock advances more than 20% within 8 weeks of purchase, you should hold on to it until the fundamentals break down----this is also affirmed by O'Neill, and Lynch. But more important: following your advice, I would be sitting on the sidelines now instead of having the benefit of another 4 dollar move up in the stock---so my opinion IS right----at least for the time being in that my account has increased whereas following your lead it would be less. And I am not in the market for artistic concerns, but to make money; and stocks, contrary to your view, are as good as "in the bank"----did you ever hear of using stocks as "security". Please spare us the excuses. You are wrong----so what. I have been wrong----but I don't try to explain it away with "flim-flam". I just "cut my losses" and move on. But then, maybe that's a man's way---logic; whereas a woman "follows her guts"----if you try following your guts in this market Katherine, you will have them "shot to bits" more assuredly than if you did a tour in Nam. Discipline is the name of the game, and not thinking you know more than you do. I don't profess to know many stocks, but I usually know what I own. And I have owned either Tellabs or derivatives of Tellabs for over 5 years a minimum of 400 times-----there is value to experience. And even following the technicians model, Tellabs was on a buy signal when breaking it's recent high at 63------O'Neill says to not go out more than 10% off the base so really you should already be positioned in Tellabs, not buying more. But in my mind, it's never too late to buy Tellabs LONG TERM. My brother's broker got him in at the exact high last January at about 87-------was he wrong to buy----he is only up 54% on his money in these past few months. And so will anyone who buys and holds Tellabs----but then some people wouldn't recognize 1 of the "Great Growth Stocks" if it reared up an bit them. And my point still holds: When would you have sold Microsoft. I did because I was young and my "guts" told me to-----if I had held, I would now be retired. I won't make that mistake with Tellabs.