Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HGRM--Any Followers? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ksuave who wrote (2733)	6/18/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: george eberting	Respond to of 3576

Even Beavus and friend have a little excitement sometimes. As for me, I'm not a drinking man but some bootleg vodka might be just take care of what's ailing this company.

To: ksuave who wrote (2733)	6/18/1999 1:48:00 AM
From: Leslie Tack	Respond to of 3576

Bob, I hope you don't think "RBaron" is me with an alias..... Ciao -Les

To: ksuave who wrote (2733)	6/18/1999 1:51:00 AM
From: Leslie Tack	Respond to of 3576

Cabin fever here ladies and gents.....we need to have a vodka and ice I think. I have three week vacation Down Under.....I can still get email though.

To: ksuave who wrote (2733)	6/18/1999 2:28:00 AM
From: Ted M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3576

<the magnitude of HGRM is better reflected in the number of shares traded....> No doubt the volume has been low. But then again it was low within days of the Russian announcement and low within days of the BusinessWeek article. It seems that only a small group of investors like the risk/reward and those that do are comfortable with the amount they own. It would also seem that no news is 'leaking' out that would confirm that the first payment either is or isn't being made. You said that no news is bad news. I assume you mean it is bad because the price keeps drifting down. I see it differently. From my perhaps odd viewpoint no news accompanied with unremarkable volume actually is translating to a better risk/reward ratio. The lack of volume would seem to support the idea that there really is no bad news being withheld, at least that anyone knows about. If that is the case, the stock is less risky now than it has been for months. Feel free to present another viewpoint. Although frusrated, until proven otherwise I'll continue to wear the rose-colored glasses at these prices. If the price goes up to say 5 or 6 on unremarkable volume and no news I'll become more worried but less frustrated than I am now. Ted