Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard S. Gates who wrote (15640)	6/18/1999 8:49:00 AM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Richard-your interpretation is not quite correct, IMO. Certainly, one porphyry system is not responsible for minerlization at both LDM and Lipangue-this was obvious from the begining due to the distances involved. However, they maybe related in other ways-ie same source of magma from a central batholitic structure-same tectonic crustal weakness-part of a series of breccia pipes/porphyry deposits etc. What is important here is whether we have near continous minerlization from one property to another. Based on the rumor mill-it certainly sounds like this is the case.