Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (9721)	6/18/1999 9:49:00 AM
From: ENOTS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Old news , I wanted to post before tmrent jumps in and cries wolf...this move by shelton was not the best move, however he has a lot of stock LEFT! News June 17, 18:08 Eastern Time CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORP. DIRECTOR FILES SEC FORM 4 WASHINGTON, DC, Jun. 17, 1999 (States via COMTEX) -- C. Shelton James of Boca Raton, FL, a Director of Concurrent Computer Corp. (SYMBOL: CCUR), disposed of 232,000 shares in 3 transactions for between $4.76 - $5.13 each between May 21, 1999 a nd May 28, 1999. C. Shelton James currently owns 370,900 shares. A Form 4 reporting the transaction was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 08, 1999.

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (9721)	6/18/1999 9:54:00 AM
From: Nimbus	Respond to of 21143

Again wrong .... I was valedictorian the year I got my BSEE. And speaking about too much time on your hands ... you clearly win that award based on your constant posting ... at least a dozen a day I'd say. I'm still waiting for a post of technical substance from you. You are the one with questionable technical merit. Still think the MH operates with a "UNIX wrapper around NT" or was it a "NT wrapper around UNIX" ? ... that was a classic "McDumbass" post. BTW ... ever play with wavelets ??? I have, and it is the next tier of compression technology beyond mpeg. Still takes a stout machine to decode it in RT, but getting more cost effective every year. I don't however see anyone's server being at a disadvantage in serving wavelet based content in place of Mpeg.