Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2314)	6/18/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Krikor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

Claude, Excited!! Make your fax alert faster<g>... We are not talking just an extra gold content here to add to the value. It looks like the whole process could be profitable by just mining the gold. Regards, KG

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2314)	6/19/1999 2:10:00 PM
From: Amit Ghate	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4504

Hi all, Nice to finally have something to talk about! I have a couple questions (corrections?) re the NR. 1. Drill hole TG-1 intercept over interval 26.0 to 30.9 meters should read true width 4.9 m at 150.7 g/t Ag, not 12.0 m true width. This correction may slightly affect the average grade calculated for the deposit. 2. I don't understand how the average of TG-11 can be 628.9 g/t over 13.8 m, when 10.7 m of that interval show an average around 25 g/t. Are there nuggets in the samples? If so how will that affect continuity calculations? 3. How did these assays compare to the BRGM assays with respect to Ag values (which I believe are the only overlapping elements in the assays)? Best Regards, Amit