SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (62293)6/18/1999 12:02:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572102
 
<PB - re: I will keep saying this until I'm blue in the face. The optical shrink Dixon QS is working as expected. You all are reading things into the situation that are not accurate.

PB,

Could you shed some light on the current problems with 0.18u?

Kap.




To: Process Boy who wrote (62293)6/18/1999 12:07:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572102
 
Re: "The optical shrink Dixon QS is working as expected."

So what you're implying is that this is a design/speed path issue? Or that there is a problem adding the extra metal layer?

Kevin



To: Process Boy who wrote (62293)6/18/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572102
 
PB - RE: "I will keep saying this until I'm blue in the face. The optical shrink Dixon QS is working as expected. You all are reading things into the situation that are not accurate."

Well then the timing couldn't have come at a more controversial (yeah, I know that word is a little too harsh) time, which is why the two were linked.

BTW, I had no idea what the "expected" was.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News