Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (2340)	6/18/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: Andrew Cook	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

Random thoughts and some questions that some of you gurus may be able to answer. This whole project gives the phrase "Open in All Directions" a multitude of interpretations (TG-1, TG-x, the District, AU, AU in the sulfide zone). Speaking of the sulphide zone, this little nugget in the most recent news: <<< The Company expects to release assay results from the BRGM sulphide zone drilling within the next ten days.>>> leads me to the following question that one of you may shed some light on. It seemed consensus that there was a pretty decent possibility that there might have been gold content in the oxide cap. What are the chances for the sulphide zone? Also, can anyone shed some perspective on the other targets. When you have a situation like this where you have a inferred resource with surrounding targets (I assume these are targets from geophysical work), is there really much chance that the targets come up dry??? -- Andrew