SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (2343)6/18/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: Jeff Dickson  Respond to of 4504
 
> do we have a base metal mine with gold - or a gold mine with base
> metals

Perhaps even better: A gold mine and then a base metal mine.

Nesbitt is buying a lot of MAN today. They bought a nice chunk right when the HALT lifted, at +$.40. Kind of odd to see that.

As to be expected, FM is the major seller.

We're missing an ol' S10er around here -- Kacy, ya out there???



To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (2343)6/18/1999 4:06:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
<<If that Au content is homogenous, you could very well be right .... do we have a base metal mine with gold - or a gold mine with base metals >>

I spent the last few hours looking at the location of those drill holes and the distribution of grades there...and IMVHO, this will be economic. It would be very surprising if the coming in-fill drill holes do not confirm the continuity of the stuff.

But as you know... mining is full of surprises.

CC



To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (2343)6/18/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: Krikor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
Mark,

I would prefer base metal with Au because base metals are showing some life but gold is another story.

Have a nice week end,
KG