SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Phoenix who wrote (24401)6/18/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: William Hunt  Respond to of 74651
 
Thread---Microsoft Corp.
Dow Jones Newswires -- June 18, 1999
DJ Microsoft Trial Testimony Ends Next Week;Talks May
Start

By Mark Boslet

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Arguments in the rebuttal phase of the Microsoft Corp. (MSFT)
antitrust trial will conclude next week with the testimony of Microsoft's final witness, the economist
Richard Schmalensee.

That should open the door to new settlement discussions, though the two sides remain far apart, and
lead to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's first ruling in the case, expected as early as mid-September.

Microsoft will bring Schmalensee, dean of the Sloan School at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, to the stand on Monday to argue the company hasn't acted in a predatory way and
doesn't have monopoly power.

Schmalensee made similar claims during a January appearance at the trial, where he tried to counter
claims from the Justice Department and 19 states that Microsoft used its Windows monopoly to
crush browser rival Netscape Communications Corp.

With the conclusion of four weeks of rebuttal arguments on Thursday or next Friday, Microsoft and
government lawyers will turn their attention to preparing lengthy "findings of fact" briefings. The
briefings, of several hundred pages, will be submitted to the court at the end of July, and several days
of hearings may follow.

Attorneys said that should leave Jackson in the position to rule in the case by the middle of
September or early October. Jackson has said he will first write a "findings of fact," with conclusions
on whether Microsoft has a monopoly, or whether its browser distribution contracts were restrictive.
A "findings of law" will follow, perhaps by Thanksgiving.

Attorneys for both sides met once in late March, with the then 4 1/2-month trial in recess, for their
only settlement discussion. The two-hour meeting adjourned after little progress, and contact between
negotiating teams since has been minimal, with only a few documents exchanged.

Government and Microsoft attorneys say it is "not unlikely" they will try to narrow their substantial
differences once rebuttal arguments conclude.

Microsoft officials claim Schmalensee will "connect the dots" in the antitrust defense they have laid out
in federal district court here.

He will argue Microsoft's efforts to distribute its Explorer browser and integrate it into Windows
were legitimate - and not predatory - responses to competition. The government claims the restrictive
distribution contracts and integration with Windows represent anticompetitive and tying violations of
antitrust law.

Schmalensee also is expected to argue that threats to the market position of Microsoft's Windows
come from outside the world of operating systems designed to run on computers using Intel Corp.
(INTC)-compatible chips.

These threats, he will claim, undermine the government conclusion Microsoft has monopoly power.

BEST WISHES