SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (63361)6/19/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Tom D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<<Did you really go long AMZN or was that just a joke.>>

There is irrefutable evidence that Glenn has opened a long position in AMZN: After posting that trade, the stock promptly went down 20%. What more proof could anyone need? He jinxed the stock.

Please not that I have the highest regard for Glenn, and expect him to do very well in his AMZN position. But I cannot resist the urge to gently tease him.

:>)
Tom D



To: Wayners who wrote (63361)6/19/1999 11:32:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Did you really go long AMZN or was that just a joke. If you went long AMZN there's
nothing wrong with that. However, I now consider you as I do a lot of others, technical
analysts in fundamentalist clothing.


Wayne,

I did go long Amazon. I also do not do TA. I can prove that with my short of AMZN last year when clearly the trend was up. I stuck foolishly to my FA inspite of the way overshoot on AMZN in my opinion.

I changed my mind on the FA for AMZN based on the Sotherby's alliance and the SEC filings from trucking firms. That is post is here. I will locte it. Re-post it and bookmark it so I can link to it when questioned in the future.

I ask other people for TA because I have not studied TA enough.

Glenn



To: Wayners who wrote (63361)6/19/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
exchange2000.com