Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Labor Ready (LRW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j lawrence who wrote (213)	6/20/1999 1:12:00 AM
From: Khris Vogel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 379

That's your typical response - ignore the facts and spew your venom. Spew my venom? Joe, you really are reality-challenged, aren't you? I told you straight-up that I'm responding to your personal attacks, and some how you twist that to me spewing the venom? Oooooookay... As far as 'ignoring the facts,' hey, I'm ignoring no such thing. You lay out some valid criticisms of LRW WITH VERIFIABLE DETAILS (i.e., none of this unnamed sources garbage), and I'll more than happy to discuss them w/ you. But in light of the fact that you and Seuss have failed to post one verifiable piece of info on this co. puts you on the defensive, not me. Go ahead and slam me all you want (I'm expecting no less, as your m.o. doesn't allow for anything else), but that does not, by any definition, change the facts, which are on my (and my fellow longs') side. No, I am not going to supply you with names, addresses, or phone numbers. Somebody would have to be really stupid not to see right thru that one. Think about it, Joe - I'm one of the most outspoken longs on LRW. If you really wanted to make some $ on this stock, one very could way would be to eliminate my credibility by coughing up details of your info. You do that, hey, I look stupid. But you fail to do that, well, let's just say that you'll continue to wear the dunce hat. That none of you shorts care to provide one single, solitary specific as to a verfifiable source for your info is beyond lame - it's outright pathetic. As I stated before and above, I'm not interested in a pissing match, as it bores the heck out of me and anyone else looking to intelligently discuss this stock. If you want to share factual information and debate the topics based on said info, great. But your continual failure to do just that doesn't undermine me, buddy; it undermines you.