SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bob sims who wrote (2300)6/19/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7056
 
a lot of shareholders are concerned about any criminal shorting that went on that depressed the price of stock illegally.

Please explain the mechanism by which this alleged "criminal shorting" was effected.

Sure wish I knew a law firm willing to work on a contingency basis on behalf of myself and other stockholders who had the price of the stock fall due to illegal manipulative shorting or whatever.

Several class action suits are pending. That's what they're for.



To: bob sims who wrote (2300)6/19/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7056
 
the price fell because the stock isnt worth a dime over a dime.and if it is explain why and your basis..the flaw with your claim is that second , third and 4 th levelk tiers stocks...get punished severly for having any problems..and HITT has many ..it will one day be zero..as a stock..I believe that with all my heart ,,Now explain to me why it should be trading at or near a billion dollar market cap



To: bob sims who wrote (2300)6/19/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7056
 
Uh, bobmeister, I'm afraid you'll have to do better than that:

<Judge> So&#151what seems to be the issue?

<bobmeister> "&#133illegal manipulative shorting or whatever."

<Judge> Mr. Simsmeister, what is the actionable infraction here?

<bobmeister> "&#133illegal manipulative shorting or whatever."

<Judge> Mr. Simsmeister, what are the actual grounds upon which you're bringing suit?

<bobmeister> "&#133illegal manipulative shorting or whatever."

<Judge> Dude, do you actually have a reason which you can intelligently articulate?

<bobmeister> You mean, if I sue, I actually have to have a reason?



To: bob sims who wrote (2300)6/19/1999 2:36:00 PM
From: Sawdusty  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7056
 
After reading many of your posts....over, and over,and over, I am not sure that you can respond to this in a factual and intelligent way, but let's try.

""Sure wish I knew a law firm willing to work on a contingency basis on behalf of myself
and other stockholders who had the price of the stock
fall due to illegal manipulative shorting or whatever.""


Please explain to all of us, your definition of "illegal manipulative shorting".

When you are finished with that, I personally cannot wait for you to define "or whatever"



To: bob sims who wrote (2300)6/20/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: Q.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7056
 
Bob, if you wonder whether the stock fell because of 'illegal manipulative shorting,

...then ...

do you also wonder whether it had originally soared to a $1 Billion market cap as the result of 'illegal manipulative longing'?


FWIW, I think the stock fell because a Bloomberg article came out with a headline that let the air out of the bubble.