Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: .Trev who wrote (21150)	6/19/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

No trev I think Rick said: Eventually this stock will be a blue chip producing company that will be worth $30/share but we need to panic Monday morn and sell in case it goes down 50 cents. At least that my take on it.

To: .Trev who wrote (21150)	6/19/1999 6:31:00 PM
From: gg cox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

To all. I emailed Winspear this morning regarding the two day halt and here is their reply. Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 15:09:28 -0700 From: Sophie Taylor <randgrp@helix.net> X-Accept-Language: en To: Subject: Re: On the halt The two day halt was unavoidable. Not all the results were back on Thursday and they were still waiting for some numbers, Friday. I think Winspear had no choice but to halt for two days. The tactics people had been using to get "inside information" were astonishing. I've been with the Company for four years and I haven't ever witnessed such invasive behaviour. The Company, the V.S.E. and the resource industry in general could not have handled any mistakes in reporting such significant news. I think the two day halt was totally necessary to ensure 1) an even playing field and 2) maintain the Company's and the industry's integrity. Thank you for your comments. Sophie Taylor Corporate Development.