Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flatsville who wrote (6060)	6/19/1999 7:40:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

<Lt. Col. Paul Avella, manager of Y2K Flag, said no surprises have been found in the four-day exercise, which ended Thursday ... Two F-15s participating in the Y2K Flag were injured, neither seriously, when their planes crashed Tuesday.> Duh ... they anticipated problems with those two F-15s. So it was no surprise???? <Two F-15s ... were injured ...> What in the hll does "injured" mean anyway???? Wonder how many F-15's were involved with this exercise. Two? <For three years, the Defense Department has been preparing for any computer glitches that might be encountered at the turn of the century ... Three years???? LOL - No one even realized there was a problem with embedded systems until early '97* when someone from Shell, working on North Sea rigs ... investigated on his own. How, pray tell, has DOD been working on something they knew nothing about, especially when NOTHING was budgeted? FYI - In late '97 someone sent me an email with an attachment. When I opened it up, the first thing that I saw was DOD logo. It was one of their first drafts on addressing Y2K. <U.S military aircraft will be Y2K compliant and will be able to ''fly, fight and win on Jan. 1 and beyond,''> I can't believe this "feel happy" B.S. I'M DISGUSTED. Cheryl 195 Days ...

To: flatsville who wrote (6060)	6/19/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: B.K.Myers	Respond to of 9818

Two F-15s participating in the Y2K Flag were injured, neither seriously, when their planes crashed Tuesday. The cause is under investigation. This should not have been a surprise! The DOD knew that the F-15 had Y2K problems. The Navy Tomahawk missile also has problems. Good thing they didn't decide to test their missiles? Department of Defense. During Bill Curtis' 27-year career as a military computer programmer, he wrote more than a few lines of code that were century-insensitive. "I made decisions that we could only use two digits for the date," he confesses. Now, as the head of the Department of Defense's Y2K office, Curtis is in charge of fixing his own--and everyone else's--software screwups. It's a job nobody else wanted. Although the Pentagon began Y2K planning in 1995, repairs of the most vital computer systems were only 9% complete this spring. The F-15 and the Navy's Tomahawk missile are two of 34 as yet undebugged weapons systems cited in a report scheduled to be released this week. When pressed, Curtis admits that even the military's most "mission critical" systems--perhaps 2,800 in all--won't be ready in time. Officials insist that America's nuclear arsenal is more or less fail-safe, which means that if the computer systems go haywire, the missiles won't launch. Whether the same is true of Russia's nukes is an open question. cgi.pathfinder.com Strangely enough, Jim Garamone (American Forces Press Service) wrote this last July. For high-technology, computer-dependent DOD, a Y2K computer glitch might cause an F-15 fighter pilot to crash. af.mil Interestingly, just last month they sounded confident. "During this portion of the Y2K Flag, we're concentrating mainly on the third phase with some command and control elements added in," Dowty said. In each test, we set the clocks to various critical dates -- such as December 31, 1999; January 1, 2000; February 28 and 29, for the leap year. As the clock ticks to the midnight hour, we carefully monitor what happens." Once past midnight, pilots check their onboard systems to ensure they operate correctly in the Year 2000 environment. "The good news is that as we're looking at these systems, we're just not seeing many problems at all," said Dowty. "So far, we haven't encountered any problems with any of our munitions. Even our most date-sensitive equipment, the global positioning system receiver, had zero failures." af.mil Did you notice that their GPS didn't have a problem Y2K? But I don't see where they tested the GPS rollover date 8/21/1999-8/22/1999! B.K.