Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lostmymoney who wrote (749)	6/20/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: Seth L.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

mike clearly what you said in your last post was groundless. lets go through that post: Usat has been under investigation Witold. I do not think they are trading again. Mike USAT is a pink sheet issue now. I am sure they are efforting to regain BB status. If you want to buy USAT shares you can. whenever there are legitimate questions raised as to FCM and USAT and other dealings, such as no working website for their latest customer, there is nothing but arguing, no answers. Mike legitimate questions are answered all the time on these threads. If the posters know the answers they are very good at sharing. I think the main problem is not the questions/statements but in the context in which they are asked/stated. If I may, which will bring an honest effort from a knowledgeable poster #1 you stated from this copied post I doubt very seriously that any of these questions were answered at the meeting either. When your at their house (FCM meeting), they are IMO the warden, and prepared. or #2 Could someone there please post any questions asked and answered regarding USAT, Mcgruder law suit, Revenues, JV, Etc. Fact is Mike, your choice of phrase framed the meeting in a negative light. That's fine if you had actually witnessed what you portrayed, but in truth you have not even talked with anyone that was there. I am also sure* Bruce was most likely biased towards FCM, in his comments.* Which is it Mike your "sure" or its "most likely" that Bruce was biased. this is great example of a poster saying something as fact and hiding the fact that they are guessing. I think Bruce was very unbiased on his report. I see little hype all factual statements of events that occurred. Geez man that statement was unfair and uncalled-for. He takes the time and the money to learn more about his investment than kindly reports it here clearly and all you can muster up is that he was biased. Sorry man you lost me right there too. Quit frankly, I do not know what is going on with USAT, nor FCM, except USAT investigation, a customer of FCM, and a low stock price. Well Mike as long as USAT clears themself with the SEC and they have the funds to pay for contracted orders and keep ordering products from Franklin I could careless. As for the low share price, I can only say there we are all disappointed ......Including the officers and board members of FCM As for changing the FCM header page? Nope, fact is IPO will come just not this summer. So be it. I can wait!! Sethy