Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ROC who wrote (5378)	6/20/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: Chuzzlewit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6021

ROC -- one of the misunderstandings about share repurchase is the eps issue. First the theory: Let's assume that a company has a market capitalization of $10 BB, earnings of $500 MM with 500 MM shares outstanding. That means that the price per share is $20. Now let's assume that the company has $1 BB in cash with which it can either purchase 50 MM shares or dividend the cash to investors. If it dividends the cash to investors the capitalized value of the company will fall to $9 BB, but investors will receive $1 BB in cash -- or, if you prefer, the price per share will fall to $18, but neglecting taxes the investor's wealth is intact because he will have $2 in cash. It will still be $20. Alternatively, the company can expend $1 BB to repurchase shares. Again the company's capitalized value falls to $9 BB, but this time the number of shares drops to 450 MM (500 - 50). The value of the company on a per share basis is still $20. This is a situation the investor can exactly mimic by using his dividend to purchase shares. The reason that a share repurchase is preferable to a dividend reinvestment is that dividends are taxable on receipt as ordinary income, but shares repurchased become capital gains. The boost in eps is a red herring because a company should maintain only the amount of cash it needs for operating and capital replacement requirements. Any residual cash (known as free cash flow) should either be invested at a rate higher than the firm's weighted average cost of capital or dividended out to shareholders. Put another way, the value of a firm has nothing to do with the number of shares it has outstanding. It is based on aggregate income (or cash flow if you prefer). **** Now the practice: Companies repurchase shares when they believe that the price of the stock is too low. That implies that their assessment of the company's prospects are different than that of the investors. This implies that the company knows something that the investor does not know and will trade on it. That smacks of self-dealing because the individual investor is at a disadvantage. Other companies repurchase shares on an ongoing basis as a tax-advantaged dividend. This has been the practice of Dell for several years. I apologize if I am too long winded. I hope this helps. TTFN, CTC

To: ROC who wrote (5378)	6/26/1999 5:59:00 PM
From: Baggins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6021

Nothing. You seem on target to me. ================================== I don't understand your comment. Isn't the repurchase, simply management's attempt to increase earnings per share? What does this have to do w/inside information? Less shares should mean more earnings per share. If management can't figure out where to spend its cash to earn dollars to increase earnings per share, then why not use cash to buy back shares if same are undervalued (in the opinion of management). What am I missing?