SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Samex Mining | OTC:BB - SMXMF | Canada - V.SXG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geoffreycs who wrote (377)6/21/1999 2:26:00 AM
From: Steven Fischer  Respond to of 539
 
Well lets see...

Three holes no sign of economic results.. sounds like I would get the same samples from my backyard? I think not. I will wait for more holes and assay results. I predict, if gold/silver is struck, a very low cost producing area would turn a very strong profit.

Take a look at symbol geo on tse ; a very low cost producing mine in Mexico, and there economic data. It is my interpretation that the current operation in area for sxg would even be 20% less costly to produce than geo.

In the current situation of the price of certain metals, the bottom line is low cost production in correlation price per metal...

my point of view, not a rocket scientist and off line for a moment....

-steve



To: geoffreycs who wrote (377)6/22/1999 1:26:00 AM
From: Travbfree  Respond to of 539
 
Have you any particular companies in mind?

"Least expensive" to me comes not from absolute knowledge of all the players in the industry but from the knowledge I have of the industry... The fully correct sentence may have read,

"Seems to me...sxg is the least expensive ticket to the party"

But, I'm not backing off of my statement either, I'm open to debate the potentials of this junior and compare the pro's and con's of SXG to others in the market... I'm also game to learn a few things if all in conversation present their points well and display insight and understanding.