SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MRV Communications (MRVC) opinions? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rascalbythesea who wrote (13980)6/20/1999 10:35:00 PM
From: Sector Investor  Respond to of 42804
 
<<But frustration is setting in. However I am still a believer. Noam has me at least until I hear the Q4 1999 results and future prospects. (barring any unforeseen developments of course).>>

I agree Benny. Promise is one thing, but now it is time for the reward. I think that we should have a much clearer view by the end of the year.

I have said before that I think 1998 was the acquisition year for the pieces they needed, 1999 is the development year to get new products announced and in evaluations, and 2000 forward should be the payoff from this product development cycle.

I said before that visibility is linked to long term contracts. When your sales is composed of many small sales, each quarter is somewhat unpredictable and susceptable to slowdowns in economies, budget cutbacks, etc.

But if MRVC gets some wins in the carrier market, they should be able to smooth out their revenue and earnings growth as ASND did, and this is called Visibility. Remember, that the pricetags of this new equipment will be much higher (Aranea has to be upper 6 figures at least per box in a full configuration), and no carrier is going to buy just one. Same with MetroFusion, a win is multiple nodes for 6-7 figures, not just one low end Ethnernet switch for $6-10K

If their new products are winners, they WILL get their share of wins. If they are doing their job, we should start seeing results by the end of the year or shortly thereafter. If not, then management has not lived up to it's promise.



To: rascalbythesea who wrote (13980)6/21/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: Greg h2o  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42804
 
I still believe that much of the problem is with MRV's inability to cope with the fact that they sell products to their direct competition. This has caused them to keep a low profile when it comes to selling the MRV brand name....it clearly keeps them from tooting their own horn too loudly.
greg