Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CDN. MOMO PUPPIES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (2018)	6/20/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: Shaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

Hi Ed, I've always been leery of big deposit numbers that aren't ranked in the proven, probable or possible categories. Also, 0.8 g/t or about .023 opt is a pretty small grade. I've consulted in the industry and I have heard of inferred resource or inferred reserve but never "computer generated". All MO, Dean

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (2018)	6/20/1999 8:42:00 PM
From: NAUGHTY NOTES	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

kaz- alberta has been up 8 days in a row, and is thin...put it on your radar.

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (2018)	6/20/1999 9:01:00 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

ED - We have all seen these "Black Box" stories in both Oil and Gas. Maybe someday one will really work. I would assume at this stage that all calculations for tonnage etc are some sort of computer generated model. Give us all the goods - I am willing to read anything

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (2018)	6/21/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: Don Richards	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

Hello Ed! Just thought I'd throw in my opinion as too,fwiw! (alas,not much!!) "Computer-generate models"sounds weird and unnecessary to me to confirm a mineral inventory!That's what diamond drilling is for imo.So before the computer could generate an accurate image,it would require the data obtained from diamond drill results (which are all that is needed to confirm!) So I don't know what their point is.Even diamond drilling is not entirely accurate because of dips,concentrations,etc.in the orebody,and they won't know how much is really there until they actually mine it!!It sounds rather odd for them to suggest that "computer generated models"would substiantiate the size of the orebody.Personally,I'd rather read a nr that began with "Diamond drilling has confirmed...."MOO.Don ps-If it runs to a quick double like LWN did,that would be fine!!This time I think I could hold on for the profit!!!!