To: Director who wrote (3404 ) 6/21/1999 12:56:00 PM From: esecurities(tm) Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4231
Forced Patience? >>but this continued looking for things that "could", >> "possibly", "maybe there was a second Elmo >>on the grassy knoll", be going on is a waste of this >> thread's purpose, and this reader's time. With all due respect, Director, we agree with you precisely...esecurities will always attempt to deal with only issues of facts and not "...things that "...could", "possibly"..be going on..." Thins that "could of" or "should of",, it apparently turns out?, is what NewKidCo International simply based said NewKidCo LLC buyout terms upon...we are not dwelling/obsessing on anything. The terms of the buyout were only released last week, June 15th, and we are simply putting said terms into perspective [and within a NewKidCo International (TSE:NKC)(NASD OTC BB:NKCIF) shareholder thread] with previous representations so exisiting/potential NewKidCo shareholders/investors are aware of the issues of facts surrounding said "NewKidCo LLC Buyout". >How can you say that "none" of the buyout terms >were met when the 4,000,000 shares have > become exercisable? Issues of Facts in re: *NewKidCo LLC Offer [terms] "...NewKidCo management expects* NewKidCo's revenues to be in the range of $9 million (U.S.) in the fourth quarter [1998 ending December 31] with strong earnings contribution..." No Elmo® product was shipped Q4 1998 and the Company sustained substantial losses.Issues of Facts : 4,000,000 shares have become exercisable. [This was not a conditional term but part of the offer to NewKidCo LLC] Again, none of this simply has anything to do with patience and urge you to stop attempting to mask/confuse said NewKidCo's shortfalls with investor's [forced] patience. *could of, should of... Let's move on to the NASDAQ issue. How does NKC(IF) list NASDAQ as its highest priority if said "WARRANT" share issuance WILL NOT be registered pursuant to the U.S. Securities Act of 1933?