Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (35669)	6/22/1999 2:32:00 AM
From: PaulM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116836

Weak Prices Threaten Normandy Gold Mines iht.com P.S. Isn't the current policy toward gold bizarre by any standards? Assume the CB's want to unload EVERY ounce because gold is "demonetized." Would it not have made more sense to unload in orderly fashion, keep POG at $310 or so, fill the supply deficit at that level, and allow many more mines to survive? Alternatively, if you believe that gold was managed lower to preserve the strength of the dollar, and by extension all currencies, how can the CB's expect to maintain that goal if the price is so low that supply is restricted? As it stands now, a) exploration expenditure has steadily decreased since the end of 1997; b) huge amounts of future supply have been sold forward and are already accounted for (a situation unique to gold and silver among commodities); c) to reduce cash costs to meet low price pressures in the short term, the life of many mines has been reduced longer term; and d) these and other factors have just now begun to result in the first reduction in supply this decade in 1st Q 99. Since then, the price has fallen farther. Structural changes such as these don't turn around overnight, even in the face of a higher price. The "market" is telling us it wants less supply for a long time. I suspect the CB's should have been more careful what they wished for.

To: Rarebird who wrote (35669)	6/22/1999 7:30:00 AM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116836

<<We see the tragedy in the mania and we will experience the mania in the tragedy. How bad do you want it to get? An internet outage seems quite possible. So does $1,000 Gold.>> I see quite the opposite, If things are excessivly "bad" no one will have the money to buy gold, but I'm not sure "2000" is the answer, or will be the problem many see.

To: Rarebird who wrote (35669)	6/22/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116836

You want to know what really bothers me concerning this whole gold thing? Many of the same companies and individuals who now are saying "gold price means nothing" will be the same ones to hold it up as a sign of inflation (under the future President George Bush) when it again runs. Yes, gold is political & manipulated, and I'm now sure for manipulated for political and profit reasons. I just never thought the Republicans would be so stupid as to allow it to go on.