SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2392)6/22/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: TrueScouse  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4504
 
Claude:

<<I'll be happy if we only get a sulfides deposit>>

LOL!

That would just about double the price, so I'd be happy too <g>

Any idea when we might hear some news about step out holes on TG-1? The more I look at the diagrams of the deposit from the slide show, the more it looks like there's a good chance of increasing the size of TG-1. e.g. Hole TG14 has a total intercept of 90 metres of at least 3.3% Cu, and it looks to be wide open north-east of that (Section B-B).

Incidentally, I've recently installed a colour bubblejet printer, and the cross-section slides look **wonderful** printed out!

Regards,
Howy



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2392)6/22/1999 10:57:00 AM
From: Jon Matz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4504
 
OT.. Claude the long awaited Behre Dolbear report summary has been published on Golden Eagle International (MYNG). Please comment.

Message 10217417

Thank you, Jon



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2392)6/22/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: James N. Wilson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4504
 
<It is unlikely that TG# will have an identical geological setting >

CC - I understand the TG1 step-outs are encountering this oxide zone, will have to wait for assays to find out if the AU/AG is there. Now at 34 holes drilled.

Results from Prev. BRGM sulphide zone perhaps early next week.

james